Both matter the same. Just had to pick a pic....
Does it make any sense that people picked Eric Garner's life over the fetus' in the above poll, but they choose the fetus here?
Pedophiles, Rapists and murderers should be put down.
The prisoner could've been falsely accused
And the baby wasn't accused of anything....
The person who isn't a murderer.
I picked the second picture, however, I remain pro-choice.
The one's that's alive, even though they're in jail.
How is a fetus dead?
I don't think i said it was dead. It's what i would call "the possibility for life". If it can't survive outside the mother's womb naturally, it isnmt alive (yet).
If I remove you from the environment proper to your survival at this stage of your development, you will also die.
You must not be alive.
There's no "proper environment" for my "stage of development". Just proper environment for human life.
Like it or not, you're just at one stage of the human life cycle, just like every other human on earth.
There is an environment proper to your life at this stage, the absence of which would result in your death.
It is logically inconsistent to say "X is not alive because if you remove its conditions for life, it can't survive."
My sperm is alive as well, as it dies when it leaves its home.
Your sperm is a cell produced by your body, with your DNA.
You'd have to know less about reproduction than a kindergartener to think sperm are comparable to a fertilized egg.
I wasn't. I was using your analogy for another form of "life" and showing that you are using too few parameters.
Your analogy is flawed.
They don't have unique DNA. Sperm aren't separate beings. They don't go through stages of development. They are single function cells, like skin cells and blood cells.
Seriously, if you're this uninformed about the basics of early stages of human development, you should go ahead and err on the side of caution by assuming all human life is valuable.
Bravo Mr milk!
Damnnnnmmmnnnn. Bye Felicia.
That was brutal
Kicked his ass Mr milkdud