Show of HandsShow of Hands

suppressedID July 26th, 2015 5:53pm

Clean energy brought 25,000 jobs, $1B+ in private sector investment, and cut consumer electricity rates by 1.4%. So why would Gov. John Kaisch sign into law a bill that freezes Ohio's renewable energy mandate for 2 years?

9 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

ozzy
07/28/15 4:47 am

Clean energy has been an expensive disaster

knetzere Illinois
07/26/15 4:54 pm

Are these numbers for Ohio only?

knetzere Illinois
07/26/15 5:54 pm

Ah well that doesn't make much sense then. Does the mandate require a reduction elsewhere? I assume Ohio has a decent coal industry. Maybe there was potential for higher losses there? Idk the whole story

MadCow Kansas Proud
07/26/15 2:26 pm

But the ROI is positive. This doesn't make sense.

Reply
steelcity Pittsburgh
07/31/15 7:38 pm

Unless the ROI would be greater if that $1 Billion was invested elsewhere. Such as making coal plants more efficient or building nuclear reactors (if they are even allowed to do that anymore)

Rosebud Ohio
07/26/15 2:21 pm

Because he's probe to making terrible and harmful choices. He also wants to cut medical care for pregnant women and women with cancer, among other things.

Reply
ozzy
07/28/15 4:48 am

??????? Lies. I live in Ohio and am not a Kasich fan (common core), but this about energy is not true

Rosebud Ohio
07/28/15 12:25 pm

Care to prove it wrong? Check his most recent budget proposals. It's there among other things he wanted passed. Wants to show a surplus more than anything. He was good, but is quite declining.

Pragmaniac Hipsterville
07/26/15 2:15 pm

So much for the idea of a moderate Republican Presidential candidate.

Reply
DGroot America
07/26/15 7:24 pm

No, the mandate creates a a product that can't naturally pull its own weight in a market that is balanced on economic principals.

DGroot America
07/26/15 1:17 pm

You're not looking at the other side of the equation. Wind and solar are a net negative without subsidies, so by delaying mandates, he is reducing the overall tax burden.

suppressedID destiny is right now
07/26/15 2:08 pm

You think there were a BILLION $$ in subsidies? And all the jobs?

Sounds like the net effects are far higher than the investment.

DGroot America
07/26/15 2:51 pm

The simple fact is, there wouldn't be jobs added if not for the fact that wind and solar have to be subsidized to make them profitable. The same is true for your statistic that they are cheaper. It just isn't the truth.

suppressedID destiny is right now
07/26/15 5:54 pm

The mandate only creates a market insert to enter a monopolized market. But don't these numbers show the payoff is there?

DGroot America
07/26/15 7:25 pm

No, the mandate creates a a product that can't naturally pull its own weight in a market that is balanced on economic principals.

RJ1969 SoCal
07/26/15 11:46 am

Your figures are true for the U.S. If people bothered to look at what was happening around the world they might have a different opinion about new technology.

Reply