Show of HandsShow of Hands

timeout March 22nd, 2015 3:52pm

Boston Globe on Sunday urged Elizabeth Warren to reconsider her decision not to run for president in 2016. Saying Dems would be "making a big mistake" if they let Hillary Clinton get the nomination unopposed. Should Hillary be seriously challenged?

5 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

rons Thanks America
03/24/15 10:40 am

Two wackos going at it would be fun.

drself Gated Community
03/24/15 9:08 am

I don't think it matters...a lib is a lib.

Iamamerican California
03/23/15 11:32 pm

Don't like either one.

Reply
bringstheeagle Colorado
03/23/15 9:36 pm

Yes she should be challenged and she will. Enough democrats want to be president to not just stand by and watch her coronation. Remember that was the view last and some total unknown cleaned her clock.

Reply
cowboy Dawns Highway
03/23/15 9:55 am

I don't see how Hillary can run.

Reply
timeout Boston Strong
03/23/15 12:26 pm

I know your not a fan, but who else have we got? Right now she beats all GOP contenders easily according to recent polls, but she needs a strong Challenge in the primaries to get her ready for the general election. But who knows, things change fast.

cowboy Dawns Highway
03/23/15 12:36 pm

Whoever it will be will loose. So might as well run Hillary to embarrass her. It's the Republican's turn again and then Hillary's illegal e-mails will come out and bury her for good.

timeout Boston Strong
03/23/15 12:52 pm

They will loose. Thing is to debate some of these issues like the email controversy, so by the time the General election comes along it won't be as big an issue. I don't think she'll be embarrassed.

cowboy Dawns Highway
03/23/15 1:19 pm

That's because the Republicans are pussies.

CTYankee!!! Connecticut
03/22/15 5:04 pm

She'll be challenged by others than Warren

Reply
skinner Jersey City
03/22/15 9:18 am

I would like for Warren to run. I would like it even more if she won the primary. I would only stop rooting for her if she makes it to the general election and then this could seriously backfire if she actually wins the White House.

alek12 Orlando
03/22/15 9:27 am

Why support her at all then? Just curious.

redsox95 New England
03/22/15 9:32 am

Because she's a fraud, and a joke. She would be killed 80-20 in the general election against any republican.

skinner Jersey City
03/22/15 9:32 am

Warren will drive Clinton farther left in the primaries and make it harder for her to race to center. If Warren were to win the primary, then I would think it would be easy for a moderate conservative (Jeb Bush) to defeat a far left Democrat.

alek12 Orlando
03/22/15 9:44 am

Skinner, I think you're right that Bush would win against Warren. He's more moderate than the rest.

timeout Boston Strong
03/22/15 1:21 pm

I kinda agree that Warren would have a difficult time winning in the general if the pubs run a moderate. But l do think Hillary needs to be challenged by someone. Even a moderate like Jim Webb, who I hear may jump in.

skinner Jersey City
03/22/15 4:00 pm

I do think that if the primary started early then that would take some pressure off of Clinton.

bringstheeagle Colorado
03/23/15 9:38 pm

I don't think so - I like that warren is more liberal but she not a strong candidate in my view.

alek12 Orlando
03/22/15 9:27 am

She's rumored to officially announce in April.

political Georgia
03/22/15 9:33 am

That's what I heard too. Rand Paul will probably announce around the same time.