Is it hypocritical to stand up for animal rights, but not the rights of unborn children?
Animals need minority status. Someone get Sharpton on this.
By definition no, I get what you're saying tho and I agree. Keep telling yourself whatever you want pro-choice people lol.
Yes, especially considering that animals were MEANT FOR FOOD. Humans are of much greater value, and just because a baby is unborn, doesn't mean it isn't alive.
No. Standing up for animal rights doesn't have to necessarily do with an unborn animal, so what does that have to do with an unborn human?
This is not true. If you don't believe me, try destroying the eggs of a protected animal.
You didn't see when i said "necessarily"
I love animals, and sympathize with animal rights issues, but to do that while failing to support the right to life of pre-born humans, does smack of hypocrisy.
No. You are talking about a clump of cells vs a living breathing animal.
Absolutely, yes! Humans are of far greater value than any animal, even dogs. 🐾
Perfect, with exception of my new puppy Rocky...he is a real sweety!
Oh, what great dogs! Loyal and friendly and energetic! My daughter and her husband have two black ones! 🐾
One thing: hers are both easily spooked by flashes of reflected light (off my watch crystal) on the walls or ceiling. They're so ALERT!
I wouldn't say hypocritical, but rather sociopathic.
Murder is a consequence of sociopathic behavior.