Show of HandsShow of Hands

geoag02 March 14th, 2015 8:00pm

A 12 year old son of a wealthy family is paid several hundred dollars per week for doing chores such as mowing the lawn, feeding the dog, etc. Should this child be required to file a federal tax return and report this income?

19 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

Zimmeress Make Me Laugh
05/13/15 5:53 pm

If it was less than $300, you don't have to file a tax return. At least that used to be the law.

nnifer Alpha Quadrant
03/16/15 7:10 pm

The parents already paid tax for that household income.

jmw7477 Indiana
03/16/15 3:24 pm

Let the kid have his money. He'll have plenty of time to pay his taxes when he's older. I'm just glad he's doing something for the money.

jamichl Seattle
03/16/15 10:38 am

If he files his own taxes, he's no longer a dependent (exemption) for the parents.

FATSHADOW Cyborg Gorilla
03/16/15 4:43 am

I tax my kid already...when hes in his heightchair, I take 2 puffs for every 10 I give him.

Unless they are apple flavored...than I take 4 and call them Capital Gains.

Reply
jvc1133 61535
03/16/15 3:31 am

I'm sure Obama would want it but, No.

drewseph17 San Francisco
03/15/15 9:16 pm

well he earns more than I do and I have to file taxes so...

Reply
Dazey Beagles Rule
03/15/15 7:55 pm

Taxed as in income? As in employer/employee relationship? As in applying child labor, minimum wage, workers comp and other labor laws? I think not.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/15/15 10:06 pm

Why is it ok to tax employees if it isn't ok to tax this child?

Dazey Beagles Rule
03/16/15 12:15 am

Fine. Go ahead and classify him as an employee so you can have your equal application of laws. But then I want all labor laws to be equally applied as well. Including opening up the home to OSHA inspections.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/16/15 7:50 am

I would prefer to be equally free from all that crap.

Dazey Beagles Rule
03/16/15 10:08 am

Yeah, well income taxes won't be going away any time soon. The best you can hope for is incremental wins such as keeping the parameters of "employee" as narrow as possible. Expanding it to include children's chores is the wrong move.

Zod Above Pugetropolis
03/15/15 7:45 pm

It probably depends on who is paying him. If he's earning the money around the neighborhood mowing lawns and whatnot, it's reportable. If it's an allowance from his parents, I don't think it is.

Reply
JustBob Your anger fascinates me
03/15/15 7:21 pm

Shared, I like this question, I picked no, but really interested in the nation's verdict, if the kid kept the same routine for the same pay at the age of 20, Ooo then maybe compare that to 20yo who didn't do anything and dad just paid for everything

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/15/15 8:05 pm

Thanks for the share! It's nice seeing more than 60 votes on one of my questions.

geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/15/15 8:08 pm

So if the kid was going to college, getting a "full ride" from his parents and getting the same $200 worth of spending money per month for chores, would your answer change to yes?

JustBob Your anger fascinates me
03/15/15 8:16 pm

I don't know, I think if it comes from the parents, no, same as if he was 20, had a crippling world of Warcraft addiction, and his parents pitched in for his weed and Mountain Dew

rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
03/15/15 6:01 am

No, taxes are overblown in this country as it is but that money is the property of the parents and was taxed already.

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/15/15 7:02 am

If the child in this example were replaced by a 40 year old working for a sole proprietorship, the money that they are paid would have been taxed already on the proprietor's return. So how is this different?

rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
03/16/15 3:46 am

I agree. Except like most Americans I don't justify another wrong with one that already exists. "we already put Japanese people in internment camps why not these people too?" stop looking to what IS to justify what ISN'T.

cpaswr just say the letters
03/15/15 5:10 am

No. It is an allowance.

If the parents were running a business and this was the child's earnings for working at the business, my answer would be different.

Reply
synthetikeyes East Bay
03/14/15 8:02 pm

The child is a dependent. So it's not actual income. The money is staying in the family. Mom and Dad have already paid income tax on the money coming into the household.

Reply
sandy0923
03/14/15 3:29 pm

If it totals the legal amount to have to file an income tax return. I think; it's like $600.00 or more a year. Not sure of the amount.

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/15/15 7:04 am

So if the kid is making $200 per month for doing chores they had better file a 1040?!

Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
03/14/15 1:54 pm

Not unless the kid hits the min for declaring income.

Reply
Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
03/15/15 7:12 am

Yes. This isn't a discussion of whether taxes are right/wrong. It's about an instance within the current rules.

If the kid earns enough to hit the min, then like everyone else I don't see why he wouldn't pay, unless there is an age clause I forgot.

JustBob Your anger fascinates me
03/15/15 7:26 pm

I can't see someone listed as a dependent on another's taxes getting taxed for getting money from them. I would need someone to explain again what a dependent is.

Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
03/15/15 11:30 pm

There's also that, it all depends on what the stupid rules are - which are all messed up to begin with.

Torfin Never Behind
03/14/15 1:17 pm

The family is not s business from which the child is receiving pay. Unless it actually is a business and then the situation is different.

Reply
geoag02 Dallas, TX
03/14/15 1:12 pm

To those voting No, I would like to ask how does this senecio differ from a "normal" job?

Reply
Praetorianus Fair enough.
03/14/15 5:12 pm

It's not an official business. It's more akin to monthly allowance or a birthday gift.

rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
03/15/15 6:02 am

It doesn't, income tax needs to disappear.