Violence never solved anything....aside from slavery and fascism and totalitarianism and dictatorships. And the woman who pulls a gun and responds with violence against they guy who was gonna rape her? Totally didn't solve anything.
Probably true, but I voted disagree anyway. I'd say it is never a good answer, or an answer at all unless everything else has failed. The reason I voted disagree is that sometimes, rarely, almost never, it may be necessary.
World War II. The British and French people tried everything but violence to prevent war. Diplomacy, appeasement, concessions. In the end, none of it mattered, and violence early would have solved the problem more efficiently
Now and then, it's necessary to have some men who are well trained at breaking things and killing people. Thanks to all current military and veterans! 🇺🇸
Disagree. If anyone is trying to harm me or mine, violence (or the threat of violence at the very least) is the answer unless there's some better option at the time, but nothing is coming to mind.
So say North Korea was to nuclear bomb us and declare war on us unexpectedly, we shouldn't defend ourselves and declare war on them? Should we try and be diplomatic while they are killing us?
You can always find an extreme situation to illustrate an extreme point. North Korea will never nuke is so your question is irrelevant. And the poll is not, in my understanding, talking about that kind of violence.
Show of Hands
Comments: Add Comment