Show of HandsShow of Hands

Show Of Hands December 4th, 2012 12:00am

Law enforcement wants wireless carriers to be required to retain all customer text messages for at least two years. Approve?

1 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

LitasDead
12/10/12 10:10 pm

So first it's ur text messages. How about all ur calls on ur cell fone? Anyone can "grab" that info if they know how. Don't forget ur home fone. Then ur E-mail cuz someone might b planning to kill some one? BECAUSE IT MITE HAPPEN U WOULD LET THEM INVADE UR PRIVATE LIFE? F*ck that. Privacy for me!

LitasDead
12/10/12 10:04 pm

Then why hold it for two years!

LilRed
12/10/12 7:48 am

I was on a jury for a man accused of strangling his girlfriend. There were several texts sent at 3 am, right after the alleged event. If you had to make the decision to send this guy to jail or not, wouldnt you want to read the content of those messages?

iBakes California
12/09/12 9:06 am

Jdengel, higher courts recently ruled against wiretapping without a warrant. NDAA has also been recently modified. Just FYI since you seem concerned about things you may not need to be concerned about.

rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
12/08/12 4:25 pm

Then feel free to volunteer. I on the other hand value my privacy.

Most of you police supporters probably thank troops for "defending freedom." What's the point if you're just going to give it away.

qwe FEED THE BABY
12/08/12 4:33 am

It's a bad deal all the way around!!! we as a people have no rights when it comes to Big Government and Big Companies!!! It seems to me the do what the hell they want, when they want and for whatever reasons they want!!!

Reply
rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
12/08/12 12:52 am

Well "Responsible" is clearly a cop.

Stop aggressing against peaceful people. You're not fighting criminals, you're making them.

rebelfury76 No Justice, No Peace
12/08/12 12:50 am

Wow. Simply stunning how many people are supportive of a police state.

People get arrested for video taping the cops who work in public paid with public money yet they can use drones, listen to our phone calls, read our email.

It's not about something to hide. It's about liberty.

Reply
flyberg Northern Kentucky
12/07/12 4:44 pm

They shouldn't keep them past deletion by the user.

Reply
JPolgarFan
12/07/12 1:53 pm

Idiocy in a nutshell. Blame the president for just about anything.

Reply
fsu13 Grosse Pointe Park
12/07/12 10:22 am

well ok, with that logic, we should get rid of welfare programs because of the large amount of people abusing it. theres bad eggs everywhere. u cant base all judgement on the actions of few. this would greatly help police. obviously a warrant would be required based on probable cause to get near it

Reply
pinkyusuck The Carribean. I wish.
12/07/12 5:20 am

It's a matter of principle. If texts are stored, they can be read by anyone nosy enough to get access to them. That's not a good thing.

Reply
pinkyusuck The Carribean. I wish.
12/07/12 5:17 am

Hell to the no! They don't need to see my texts, and the data storage requirements would increase the cost of cell phone contracts. Bad idea all around!

Reply
Responsible
12/07/12 3:49 am

Get a grip! This has nothing to do with the cost! The government isn't storing it!

You can spend your scarce brain cells worrying about the cost of storing all those aliens in Area51!

Reply
Responsible
12/07/12 2:42 am

Our loss of freedoms have far more to do with the irrational attachment too many in the electorate have to MrO and his policies, which are sucking the life from our economy and robbing the initiative from the people.

His policies are simply not sustainable.

Responsible
12/07/12 2:39 am

With a president like ours, I wonder FAR more about how Democrats can swallow the lies they are being fed every day.

Yes, some police are corrupt, but they have NOTHING on MrO!

Reply
Responsible
12/07/12 2:34 am

So ... do you feel the sane way about MrO's definition of "fair share", or do you see the unequal, unethical, illegal and discriminatory attempt to steal from the producers of wealth in the same vein?

Reply
Responsible
12/07/12 2:30 am

Welcome to the Borg, we laugh at your petty attempt to encrypt!

Responsible
12/07/12 2:28 am

So ... with statistical significance, women have more to hide than men!

2ndafe Flat lands of Ohio
12/06/12 9:05 pm

So, Obama voter...Is this what you wanted?

Reply
jrw010
12/06/12 8:41 pm

How is it a good idea? Next step after that is all you phone calls being recorded and all your Internet activity archived for two years.

Reply
jrw010
12/06/12 8:39 pm

How do you quantify a policy like that? Minority Report?

Reply
ntvtxn62
12/06/12 4:17 pm

I see these results & I see why Obummer got re-elected- & everyone w/ a brain whines. Y'all elected the putz- now embrace him like he does gay marriage!

Reply
RoadToRuin
12/06/12 12:09 pm

Down with big brother!

Reply
ladyniner81 no hope for humanity
12/06/12 12:01 pm

only if they are VERY certain that person is guilty of something. Otherwise, if it's someone like me, who has no criminal record it is pointless and a waste of tax dollars.

tabbser
12/06/12 10:40 am

No. My text messages are private. If they snoop, I'll encrypt.

Reply
EnginE3r Texas
12/06/12 8:20 am

It's a good idea, but I wouldn't want to force them to do so, it would probably cost them more and so they would need to get that money back somehow and it will usually come from the customers.

Reply
4boot LaTrineodeur, MN
12/05/12 11:42 pm

NO...just another move toward an ever encroaching police state.

Reply
fsu13 Grosse Pointe Park
12/05/12 10:38 pm

only certain providers keep a record, not all. this would make all providers do it

Reply
fsu13 Grosse Pointe Park
12/05/12 10:37 pm

criminals are generally not that smart and most crimes are not thought through all the way. they never think they will get caught. real life is not like the movies

Reply
fsu13 Grosse Pointe Park
12/05/12 10:26 pm

how does it go against the constitution?

Reply
AMCG a Hoosier in E TN
12/05/12 8:43 pm

They already do!! Was a juror last month in a first degree murder charge, I read through a LOT of text msgs from 2010. This shouldn't matter unless you have a guilty conscience and have things to hide. And relax ppl, they aren't going to go through your boring texts unless its a damn good reason!

Reply
AMCG a Hoosier in E TN
12/05/12 8:35 pm

I just sat through a murder trial, they went for first degree but we found him not guilty. But guilty for second degree. And Yes, those text msgs were extremely important to the case!!

dflem Arizona
12/05/12 8:20 pm

Cops don't make laws they enforce them. Why should they be creating laws when a border patrol agent was just caught smuggling bricks of weed over the fence into his trunk. Wonder why people don't trust cops

bdog99
12/05/12 8:18 pm

Soon we will turn like panem In the hunger games. We will be controlled and not have freedom to do whatever we want

Reply
repubkloh36
12/05/12 8:07 pm

Another way for the government to get into our personal lives. Then again it could help solve crimes for police and other types of organizations. I'll go both ways on this one. Is a warrant required to get this information?

kaik12 Twin Cities, MN
12/05/12 7:50 pm

...pulling the alarm. Luckily there was lack of evidence and she wasn't charged. But if the messages could have been kept, the police would have been able to see the manipulation and charge the other girl with filing a false police report.

kaik12 Twin Cities, MN
12/05/12 7:48 pm

It would be very helpful if they did. My friend was nearly charged with a felony when a girl asked her if she pulled the fire alarm in our dorm, among other questions. She said no to the fire alarm, but yes to something else. The girl manipulated the texts to make it appear as if she admitted to...

BAL North Carolina
12/05/12 7:09 pm

How long do phone carriers keep record of them now? It's okay for law enforcement to view them only with a warrant.

scalzi04
12/05/12 6:46 pm

Where? When?

Reply
38041 Georgia
12/05/12 6:35 pm

Probably. I guess I missed the section about text messages...

Reply
noahj96 North Carolina
12/05/12 6:18 pm

Goes against our constitution.... -__-

Reply
wetheslaves Live each moment fully
12/05/12 5:17 pm

When you make something illegal it also has a strong impact on people's minds. Like making teaching slaves to read was against the law. Even good people with good hearts get intimidated by evil laws. I have seen this too.

wetheslaves Live each moment fully
12/05/12 4:14 pm

I have experienced mind control of the masses first hand. Yes unfortunately I have seen this before. It is very logical and for good reasons. However, leadership is never pure and God like. It is not that hard to lead. You just need to control information and inject some leaders.. That was easy

jdengel
12/05/12 3:48 pm

Warrant less wiretapping is already permitted under the patriot act and the NDAA.

scalzi04
12/05/12 3:43 pm

Stored not aired.

Reply