Show of HandsShow of Hands

zuko November 1st, 2014 1:14pm

If the candidate with whom you share the least ideologically expresses an earnest desire to "reach across the aisle", would this fact alone cause you to change your vote and support them?

18 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

bassic
11/02/14 10:08 pm

"Reaching across the aisle" is a thing people say to get elected. Everyone knows that money is government and that no politician actually does what we think they do

amaxwell99
11/02/14 5:59 pm

No - they would probably be lying since politicians are as accurate as weathermen these days

Reply
AbandonedAccnt Not here.
11/02/14 10:38 am

It would be wrong for a representative to change his position based solely on how he's being treated by an opponent. Such shallow representation robs the constituency of thoughtful representation.

Reply
alek12 Orlando
11/01/14 10:18 pm

They say that to try and get independents.

ScrewU Gone
11/01/14 6:46 pm

That's usually the first lie they tell. Look how many democrats are claiming to be able to work with republicans when they've voted with their own party nearly 100% of the time.

Reply
ladyniner81 I need chocolate
11/01/14 5:33 pm

they have to be willing to reach a common ground with the opposite party, and prove it. time and time again. and go all out for their constituents. keep most of their promises. they'll get my vote

Reply
HappyLez No Worries... Be Happy
11/01/14 4:42 pm

Talk is cheap
If they Do some sustained actions and then I'll believe them

Reply
dlaw4570
11/01/14 2:21 pm

Any one in politics is a liar! No!

Reply
Zod Above Pugetropolis
11/01/14 1:57 pm

Expressing the desire gets my attention, but no points. Actually doing it, compromising and putting the people the government exists to serve ahead of ideology makes points. Do it consistently and often, and you get my vote AND my support.

Reply
zuko on deck
11/01/14 2:07 pm

So, to be clear, a candidate who least shares your views, but has demonstrated a pattern of compromising with the side with which you would normally agree is more attractive to you than supporting a candidate who more shares your views and sticks to

zuko on deck
11/01/14 2:07 pm

them?

Zod Above Pugetropolis
11/01/14 2:39 pm

A candidate who represents the best interests of all of us and not a particular ideology is likely to share many of my views, but even if not, I would support them. I don't see governance as black and white or red and blue, I see it as mostly grey.

jamichl Seattle
11/01/14 1:50 pm

Unfortunately experience has already shown 99% of these to be false promises, or at least not in their power (takes at least one on the other side.)

Reply
zuko on deck
11/01/14 2:11 pm

Very true. But if the promise were kept, would you vote for someone with whom you don't agree as much as the other because he/she will compromise positions to get legislation passed? Or would you rather "your guy" stick to their guns and fight for

zuko on deck
11/01/14 2:11 pm

what you mutually believe in?

jamichl Seattle
11/01/14 2:17 pm

No. But the person I do agree with more, who wants compromise, will get my Primary vote.

It all about the Primaries. If you don't vote in those, you're not making a difference.

Squidboy Snarkapottamus
11/01/14 10:42 am

He needs to have proved that somewhere...words alone won't cut it.

Reply
zuko on deck
11/01/14 12:17 pm

Assume this candidate is believable...he/she will follow through with their promise. Is a candidate that will compromise with the "other side" an attractive quality? Would you desire that in your candidate or cause you to vote for an opponent who

Squidboy Snarkapottamus
11/01/14 3:23 pm

I want a candidate that puts the country & Constitution ahead of their party. If that means breaking ranks with their party to do the 'right' thing-they have my support.

zuko on deck
11/01/14 3:45 pm

Would they have your vote, though? If you tend to side with Democrats on most issues, would you vote for a Republican who has a strong record of compromising with Democrats vs a Democrat who stands by your shared principle beliefs? Or are you saying

zuko on deck
11/01/14 3:49 pm

that you support Republicans who compromise, as in you like for your political "opponent" to give ground so that your side gets at least some of what you want?

Squidboy Snarkapottamus
11/01/14 4:06 pm

Personally, I'm independent & vote for who I think is the best candidate regardless of party. This person would have my vote and campaign donation.

zuko on deck
11/01/14 4:25 pm

Maybe I shouldn't have brought specific parties into the discussion. Does your view of the best candidate factor in the compromise factor? Do you want your candidate to compromise? I'm trying to get a feel for whether someone would abandon support

zuko on deck
11/01/14 4:27 pm

for a candidate who better "matches" your ideology (whatever that is) for someone who does not believe in the same things you do, but has demonstrated a willingness to compromise with your ideological stance in an effort to get legislation passed.

Squidboy Snarkapottamus
11/01/14 4:51 pm

Case by case basis.

Spartacus AUSTIN
11/01/14 10:24 am

Of course not. It's a ploy to acquire votes. He will soon go back to business as usual.

Torfin Never Behind
11/01/14 10:01 am

I look at their record. That meandering more than hollow words.

Diogenes FreeMeBe
11/01/14 8:04 am

Stalemate is good.

Reply
Torfin Never Behind
11/01/14 10:02 am

Absolutely! I would rather them do nothing at all than do the wrong things.

AbandonedAccnt Not here.
11/02/14 10:40 am

Damn straight! A gridlocked congress is liberty's best friend nowadays.

TierasPet
11/01/14 6:50 am

No but if they had a history of compromising, it might.

TomM
11/01/14 6:23 am

No this idea about reaching across the isle is just a gimmick to catch swing voters. I vote on opinions and record. Few actually reach across the isle and if they do it's rarely on critical issues which would me change my opinion.

Reply
zuko on deck
11/01/14 6:33 am

Even if you assume it's not a gimmick, does it work? Are voters interested in electing representatives who will look to compromise rather than stand on the positions that you either support or oppose? Who are swing voters, anyway? Thanks for voting!

TomM
11/01/14 7:11 am

It probably helps getting votes from the people who are not fully committed to that candidate. They can be comfortable he/she will work with the other side so they will get a little of both sides. At least that's what I think their rationale is.

swjboucher Just Run
11/01/14 6:23 am

Didn't Pres. Obama promise to reach across the aisle?
But that was before he realized he had a pen and a phone.

Reply
jvc1133 61535
11/01/14 6:17 am

No, he's lying.

Reply