Show of HandsShow of Hands

Show Of Hands October 31st, 2014 2:30am

Would you rather be 12 inches taller, or 6 inches shorter?

84 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

11/04/14 10:58 pm

6'8 god damn my body is ready!

11/04/14 8:30 pm

6 in shorter will be to short for me while I would only want to grow 6" 12" would be my choice

lc724 NJ
11/02/14 9:25 am

I think it's easier to be a shorter woman. I have a hard enough time finding long pants and large shoes now. I would much rather be 5'5" than 6'11".

11/02/14 8:49 am

Well, I'd be 7'5 and still growing o.o

Drpaulitics San Diego, CA
11/01/14 9:55 am

7'3" - I'd need to get in the NBA to afford the appetite that would come with being that tall. I wonder how Shaq or Yao Ming would answer this question.

omagabi Surf City
11/01/14 7:04 am

Aging reduced my height to 5' 6 1/2". Adding a foot would bring it to 6' 6 1/2". I voted for 5' 1/2". I would have to go on a very strict diet to maintain my normal BMI.

11/01/14 12:52 am

7'2 if I was taller. lol. That generally means I would get some health issues. Well, MORE health issues.

jenkp223 Being a mommy
10/31/14 8:41 pm

This is hard. If I said shorter, I'd be 4'8". If I say taller I'd be 6'4". As a woman, that might be hard to market.

Pharaoh1985 California
11/02/14 10:13 am

Same here. although at 5' 4" I already know how to be short and not being able to reach things and I don't know if I could go even shorter. And with my weight now if I went for 6' 4" I would be skinny. So... lol

10/31/14 7:48 pm

Taller if I get any shorter I might get stepped on

10/31/14 7:41 pm

7'4" I wouldn't mind it

10/31/14 6:43 pm

Amazing how many people don't know to add 12" to their height and get the correct answer. Especially when in another recent question about 75% said they were smarter than most

DoctorWu at the great hill
10/31/14 4:32 pm

7'1" would be terrible, as I am not a basketball fan. 5'7" is too short, but better than being freakish, I suppose.

holdingontoyou Pennsylvania
10/31/14 2:43 pm

I'm done growing and I'm 5' so yeah I'd rather be a foot taller...

beetlebug Harrisburg, PA
10/31/14 2:39 pm

I'm only 4'10". I guess my only choice is taller! :)

shiculka optimistic realist
10/31/14 2:14 pm

I'm 5'10" now.. Have to go with shorter option.

Starkey Nashville,TN
10/31/14 1:55 pm

Maybe a guy wouldn't want to date a girl 6'0 tall but I'd REALLY hate to only be 4'6. So, taller.

elcondor Rural Southern Indiana
10/31/14 11:21 am

7'8" would be a nightmare! My knees are already shot as it is.

poetryk California
11/01/14 3:51 am

You're 6'8" tall?

10/31/14 11:19 am

At 6'2" I'd be 7'4", nope, already too hard to find a car with enough room for my knees and legs when I drive !!!

jenkp223 Being a mommy
10/31/14 8:42 pm

Actually you would be 7'2". You're welcome.

blossoming new beginnings
10/31/14 11:15 am

A woman who is 6'7 probably wouldn't get many dates so I'll go with shorter.

thebob Medford Oregon
10/31/14 10:45 am

I'd love to be 7'3". I could had played professional basketball player!

10/31/14 10:35 am

I'm 5'7" I'd rather be shorter! It looks cute next to a guy!

angstanon San Diego, CA
10/31/14 9:33 am

I'd rather be 7'. I could finally dunk a basketball.

Wes28 CBus
10/31/14 8:50 am

Yikes. I wouldn't want to be 6-10 OR 5-4.
Tough choice.

ladyniner81 no hope for humanity
10/31/14 8:49 am

Um, 6'7" and a half , I'd have a hell of a time finding clothes, MN and I think I have a hard time finding shoes my size now? (I inherited my dad's wide big feet) but at 5'1" and a half I could find shoes. but good luck in finding them inwide width

ladyniner81 no hope for humanity
10/31/14 8:51 am

I'd probably prefer staying where I am. I

Lissy319 New Jersey
10/31/14 8:47 am

I wouldn't want to be 6'8" ... So 5'2" it is! Finally, I don't have to wear my heels and be over 6 feet!

bigdog3210 Around
10/31/14 7:34 am

I don't feel like being 7'3, so 5'9 it is.

StilettoMiss SF med law, meme queen
10/31/14 7:32 am

Probably shorter? I'm 5'8 now and wouldn't mind being 5'2, because heels are awesome that way!

10/31/14 7:12 am

Neither, I'm six feet one now.

10/31/14 7:06 am

I'm already 6'4". Don't really want to be over 7 feet tall.

EndemicCactus Texile
10/31/14 6:51 am

The I like the idea of being 7'1".

sgkitty new york
10/31/14 6:39 am

I don't want to be taller, but being 4"7 would be silly. Plus I keep shrinking with age....

FacePalm That Trick Never Works
10/31/14 7:02 am

I have the same problem - adding 12" =too tall! But 4'7 is a bit extreme

10/31/14 6:34 am

I'm already short so taller would be better.

10/31/14 6:31 am

I'm already 6'0. Couldn't take taller. Besides, I struggle for leg room with most cars, chairs, etc. 5'6 would be a bit short but I don't think I'd want 7'0. That's for my friend, Dirk Nowitzki

thedailysparton NOT Russia
10/31/14 6:23 am

I'm already above average height, if I was taller it would be weird. Shorter please!

benseth 11,780 votes
10/31/14 6:12 am

If I was a little bit taller, I'd be a baller.

10/31/14 5:59 am

Considering I'm a guy at 5ft 3, I'd gladly take taller.

Yoko318 Utah
10/31/14 5:55 am

Taller option would put me at 7 feet, so I think I'd rather shrink a bit.

FIAT2LUX On Planet Earth
10/31/14 5:47 am

2" taller?

If I had to choose, I'd choose 6" shorter because at least I'd still be able to fit in most places. If I were 6' 11", it'd be hard to fit in most places.

gonzoboy Arizona
10/31/14 5:19 am

If there's any truth to ⬇️this⬇️, and I believe there IS,
I'm certainly goin' with 12" taller. I'll be makin' bank! :D

10/31/14 5:13 am

I hit my head quiet a bit. Being shorter wouldn't be bad, assuming my weight was proportionate.

10/31/14 5:12 am

I'm already 6'2", so I'd rather be rather short than freakishly tall.

Macmurphy35 Alabama
10/31/14 4:58 am

6'10 with these skills? I'd be making millions in the NBA.