Show of Hands

It isn't discrimination if a religious leader refuses to perform a ceremony if its against that religion's beliefs. Who would want their ceremony officiated by someone who doesn't believe in it? Find an officiant who believes the same as you.

I'm a libertarian so I am fine with them marrying but forcing churches to perform their marriages is fascism.

It should be legal, so any govt officials should allow it. Churches shouldn't be forced if it's against their beliefs

It depends on who is doing the refusing.

Government officials whose job it is to marry anyone to whom their state issues marriage licenses? Illegal discrimination.

Religious authorities? Discrimination, but perfectly legal, as it ought to be.

It's like forcing a Muslim temple to serve pork to their followers. It's religious freedom.

Depends. Is the person refusing a member of the clergy and acting in that regard?

If that's the case, it's both, but legal discrimination.

A county clerk refusing to marry someone? They need to be fired for discrimination.

If a religious authority refuses to preform your silly little ceremony, no. You can choose who you let have parties at your establishment.
If a judge or whoever who does the actual legal marrying part does, then yeah, you can't do that.

I just lost a braincell for every anti-morality vote on here

It's freedom

The leftist need to be a bit more tolerant.

Obviously.