A high school in Wisconsin is hosting some students from Uganda. Parents are concerned they may have been exposed to the Ebola outbreak in Liberia, Sierra Leone or Guinea. Are their concerns reasonable?
Even if this was geographically understandable, Ebola can't be spread until after symptoms are present. You would know If someone was showing symptoms.
Uganda hasn't been hit by Ebola like the Liberia. Those kids probably haven't been in contact with an infected person, because it isn't really in their country right now.
That's like someone from a country in Africa saying they're scared of getting the flu from someone who came from New York because there is an outbreak in California. Uganda is soooo far from those countries. Settle down.
I work in a store that sells greeting cards a customer came in the other day and got all concerned when they saw that one of our cards was from Africa. Haha I love the ridiculous irrational responses some people have.
Oh god. I'm not surprised, though. I was in Kenya when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, and when I got home, so many people expressed relief that Saddam didn't get me.
I believe it's farther from Uganda to any of those countries than it is from New York City to Los Angeles. Even if people don't know that, couldn't they look at a map?
Apparently, in addition to zero understanding of infectious disease, world geography isn't one of their strengths. That would be like freaking out about maybe getting a wart in Chicago because somebody in Denver touched a toad.
If someone from those countries and who is infected or was in contact with someone who was infected or someone who came in contact with someone infected in those countries is on the flight and infects the Ugandans, maybe. But just some Ugandan
A radio host I heard last night wisely put the odds at: "You have a greater chance of being an ex-wife of Rush Limbaugh then dying from ebola in the US."
Comments: Add Comment