Show of HandsShow of Hands

Whichendisup June 4th, 2014 2:01pm

It is acceptable to not apply "innocent until proven guilty" in the "court of public opinion" bec there are no real ramifications & freedom of speech is a higher priority.

17 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

lightsabr2 The Big Sky
06/05/14 5:48 am

This reminds me of cases like the Duke lacrosse team members that were falsely accused of rape. Many assumed Guilty, but later they were acquitted and the accuser admitted to lying.

Reply
lightsabr2 The Big Sky
06/05/14 5:49 am

The court of public opinion can have a huge impact on a person's future, regardless of the findings of a judiciary court.

TierasPet
06/04/14 9:39 am

The court of public opinion is largely dependent on what the media says. Given that is the case, and the media reports what gets good ratings, judgment inevitably follows, however ill-informed.

Reply
Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
06/04/14 9:41 am

does seem that way

ThePhlegm The Lone Star State
06/04/14 9:18 am

There are real ramifications. Riots have started and cities burned because the "mob" didn't get the answer it wanted...

Reply
MachoMatt84 Privileged to serve.
06/04/14 10:24 am

*cough treyvon Martin cough cough George cough Zimmerman cough cough*

InspectorSpooky Deep Underground
06/04/14 1:23 pm

lol I heard Zimmerman got an assault or something on his GF. That dude is legit crazy, he should of gotten manslaughter.

Nemacyst No Lives Matter
06/04/14 8:58 am

This user is currently being ignored

Reply
smacc DunningKruger
06/04/14 8:01 am

Sorry no. I still believe the press should only report facts. Individuals have free speech yes but the media has a job to do and it's not entertainment.

Reply
Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
06/04/14 8:10 am

media or specifically self-named news groups? i think most media makes no attempt at news and is only for entertainment.

smacc DunningKruger
06/04/14 8:24 am

We may not have true media anymore.

Zod Above Pugetropolis
06/04/14 7:29 am

It's acceptable because public opinion is still just that, opinion, and has no official standing. "Free speech", as a right and legal concept, has absolutely nothing to do with it.

Reply
Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
06/04/14 8:06 am

I think free speech as everything to do with it. speculation is often protected as free speech, regardless of whether there is anything backing it up or not.

Arananthi Literal Ninja
06/04/14 8:24 am

Free Speech, in the legal (and only literal) sense, is the right that all American citizens have to keep *the government* from persecuting you for saying something they don't like. Public opinion isn't that, so it's irrelevant.

Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
06/04/14 8:27 am

you're saying public opinion is not protected as free speech?

Arananthi Literal Ninja
06/04/14 9:04 am

I'm saying anyone who argues "I'm allowed to talk as though this person is guilty because I have the right to freedom of speech" is being ignorant unless the guilty person is a politician. They're allowed to talk that way, but it's not because of

Arananthi Literal Ninja
06/04/14 9:06 am

some sort of special freedom granted by the Constitution.

Whichendisup uniquely unoriginal
06/04/14 9:23 am

but I bet that would be the argument on commentary shows and by people in general conversation. they are informing the public of possible facts, which until proven either way are opinion, and would argue that they have the right to express under FoS.