Show of HandsShow of Hands

violence February 6th, 2014 1:32am

Doesn't it seem horribly inconsistent to be unwilling to pay for your MINOR child to attend private school, but be willing to pay for your ADULT child's undergrad degree, and then be unwilling to pay for their graduate degree?

4 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

stefanie22 Cincinnati
02/05/14 8:01 pm

Nope. Why does he minor child need private school? And won't that child at some point then want the parent to pay for college too, and then be asking for even more money?

Reply
violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 9:20 pm

You could pay for all or none and be consistent, but the "this not that" is where the inconsistency arises.

eLucidate writing
02/05/14 7:59 pm

If a person can't figure out their own financial plan for grad school, they shouldn't go to grad school.

Reply
eLucidate writing
02/05/14 8:00 pm

The fear of being completely fucked if you fail out is part of the fun!

Rob Be Safe Be Smart
02/05/14 7:21 pm

At some point the adult needs to start acting like one, no? Sure if the parents can help, they may and probably do, but it shouldn't be expected.

Reply
violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 7:40 pm

Yeah. At what point do you say enough, you're an adult and it's time to support yourself? I'm a little shocked at the number who would be willing to pay for their child to be in school until they're 30.

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 6:52 pm

Not necessarily. The kid doesn't have to go into tens of thousands of dollars in debt to pay for a K-12 education, s/he can just go to public school basically free of charge. That's not an option for college.

Reply
violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 6:55 pm

But you already said you would pay for undergrad but not graduate school. They're an adult while attending both... Neither is, strictly speaking, required. I don't see the consistency.

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 7:00 pm

Basic cost/benefit analysis. These days it's much harder to be successful without a bachelor's degree than it used to be; it's also much more expensive. Paying, or at least helping to pay for that gives them a good, last boost before they're

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 7:02 pm

completely off on their own. Grad school is less necessary and if they choose to do it anyway, they will have less debt because I already paid the undergrad expense.

violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 7:04 pm

While that's fine, it's not precisely consistent.

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 7:11 pm

It's consistent with a core goal: to give one's kids as much opportunity as possible without creating too much dependence.

violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 7:38 pm

Wouldn't focusing more on their pre-college education so they could fund their own college education make more sense?

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 7:41 pm

That's another valid strategy, depends on the quality of the public schools and if your kid can find a good part-time job. Wouldn't that also be inconsistent by your definition though?

Vincere Seattle
02/05/14 7:56 pm

My interpretation of your argument is that the consistent thing to do would be to pay for all or none.

violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 9:18 pm

Correct. I'm still confused by what you meant, though.

jakecrs905 Long Island, NY
02/05/14 6:34 pm

I would pay for all of it if I have the financial resources.

Reply
violence Pretty hate machine
02/05/14 6:34 pm

I would pay for none of it, so at least we're both consistent.