PsychGuy London
05/07/20 6:53 pm
That’s not being pro-war. That’s acting in self-Defense.
What I mean by pro-war are those politicians that go into the Middle East because of oil, or any other invalid reason.
Really self-Defense and national security with no other option but war are valid. These are just my thoughts and beliefs on the matter.
UserIsBeing ignore. I shall return
05/07/20 6:20 pm
Abrupt climate change.
Because it literally touches every aspect of our lives. It’s not because I’m an environmentalist though... I’m a humanist. Venus has a climate too, but we would not thrive there.
.
biglued1
05/08/20 8:20 pm
Anything put forth by the damn dirty Democrats is absolutely off limits. They despise our country and all normal thinking ppl.
throwback Dixie
05/09/20 5:00 am
The deal breaker for me is the belief that anything is more important than the written words of the constitution, or that they can/should be ignored.
Cutlass473 Earth
05/07/20 7:42 pm
I’m in a relationship that started about 8+ months ago. Some differences in ideology, philosophy, values, and beliefs seem to be bigger than I want to work through.
erock129 Iowa
05/09/20 7:30 pm
I think the picture of a teenage Ivanka giving daddy a lap dance and his crude comments speak for themselves. Biden is no means a saint but Trump is as big, if not bigger, scumbag as other political figures. No wonder he was buddies with Epstein.
erock129 Iowa
05/08/20 8:12 pm
If you want to make it a contest, I believe Trump has been accused by 10 times the amount of women as Joe, just saying .......
TA7 Tre46on
05/07/20 6:37 pm
Here is a hypothetical situation:
Your nation is under attack. You barely escaped town before it was bombed. Your friends weren’t so lucky. Your country has a good chance to win if they fight back.
Candidate A advocates fighting tooth and nail to protect your people (think W. Churchill).
Candidate B advocates your entire nation surrender unconditionally.
Which would you choose?
.
TA7 Tre46on
05/07/20 9:18 pm
Ok, we three can agree on that point!
Another hypothetical:
While we may not be actively attacked by another nation, yet have concrete proof that another nation is actively planning on attacking us, is it better to undertake preemptive measures or let the attack happen?
AmericanWolf Midwest
05/07/20 8:13 pm
Marijuana legalization is the closest thing I have to a deal breaker, but it's not a practical absolute in 2020 when both sides are essentially leaning in that direction.
PsychGuy London
05/09/20 1:42 pm
Murder takes away someone’s life.
When they say life begins at conception it’s cellular life. Brain waves do not begin until weeks 5 or 6. The cerebrum doesn’t develop until weeks 8 to 10. The pain receptors with brain connectivity does not develop until 28 to 30 weeks. Or the third trimester. The myth that it begins in week 20, comes from the noxious stimuli. Or the tissue formed being damaged, and therefore causes the tissue to react, but no pain receptors are attached with the brain at this point. The myth that they scream comes from an anti-abortion film. The only sounds heard come from the operation itself.
Do you know how many abortions are done in the third trimester? 1.3%. These are done due to likely death of the mother, terrible life conditions for the soon to be newborn, and/or severe complications that will likely result in horrific results for both of them.
Comments: Add Comment