Show of HandsShow of Hands

Comments: Add Comment

MadCow Kansas Proud
10/17/13 7:58 am

And those people vote. In making corporations eligible to to make additional campaign contributions, you are effectively creating an elite class within society, one that has extra rights to ensure certain candidates advance.

It's nondemocratic!

Reply
Cole12 ...
10/17/13 7:47 am

Who creates corporations? Who works at corporations? Who owns corporations? And there's your answer.

Reply
Cole12 ...
10/17/13 8:13 am

I believe in unlimited campaign contributions for all. Whether it is democratic or not is a moot point, as we are a republic, not a democracy.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
10/17/13 8:17 am

Yes I wouldn't say "Wal-Mart is a person."
But I would say "Wal-Mart is people."

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
10/17/13 8:30 am

It's definitely an interesting comparison. Most of the subjects that they receive when given personhood, I agree with. I just think they need to go about it a different way. It creates a blurry line of distinction between people and corps.

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
10/17/13 8:08 am

Corporations are not people.

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
10/17/13 8:18 am

Can a person be cut in half and still survive?

Reply
Posco BBQ Enthusiast
10/17/13 8:24 am

That is true too.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
10/17/13 8:26 am

I'm not 100% sure what the answer it, but I do believe it has to be the same for both questions.

Reply
GoBucs22 Chief of the Obanjes
10/17/13 1:20 pm

Corporations are people whose main focus is success and self interests. This is nothing new and every day people share the same desire.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
10/17/13 7:45 am

Is "Wal-Mart" an individual human? No, but it is made up of its owners and employees, who are people.

Reply
wiildkat Propertarian
10/17/13 8:20 am

Excellent distinction!

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
10/17/13 8:20 am

Haha, fair point. I wouldn't say that any corporation is an individual, but every corporation is made of people.

Reply
cyanospool The Deep North
10/17/13 1:28 pm

They're groups of people. The entity itself is not a person, but when the individual persons who created it assemble to run it, it's not as if they magically lose all their human rights.

Reply
MrLucchese If curious, ask.
10/17/13 7:53 am

Non-human persons.

Reply
EnderWiggin So disillusioned...
10/17/13 9:27 am

Movetoamend.org is trying to, in effect, try to get the words "natural persons" into the constitution. Nothing else is a person. Except Labrador Retrievers.

Reply
KudosToYou California
10/17/13 8:27 am

People do, but people are already people.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
10/17/13 8:27 am

Well...I appreciate that you like the question, but it'll make it go away too quickly. :'(

Reply
EnderWiggin So disillusioned...
10/17/13 9:29 am

Also, somewhere on SoH someone suggested that to be able to contribute to campaigns, the requirement should be "can they vote?" Corporations cannot.

Reply
BCKR Onward and upward
10/17/13 12:59 pm

Legally, that's how they're treated. They have many of the rights of individuals but very few of the responsibilities.

Reply
skinner Jersey City
10/17/13 3:25 pm

They are not people

Reply
wiildkat Propertarian
10/17/13 8:06 am

No, but the people who run them are, ergo they demand free speech

EarlyBird Portland
10/17/13 1:26 pm

Ersco- if you like the poll, just repost it to your followers and give credit to lib for the idea.