Show of HandsShow of Hands

NateE October 16th, 2013 10:39pm

Would you support the closing of Guantanamo Bay?

29 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

zman117 Ohio
10/16/13 4:01 pm

Guantanamo is ultimately a stain on this country. It goes against everything we once claimed to stand for and fight for.

How can we claim to stand for justice if we ourselves don't uphold it?

Reply
penguins511
10/16/13 3:44 pm

(To anyone who said yes) what do you suppose we do with all the terrorists being kept there? Let them go? As if.

Reply
political Georgia
10/16/13 3:51 pm

Thank you Obama for breaking your promise! I really do not want terrorist present on the mainland.

Reply
mikeey1962 on SOH where else
10/16/13 3:50 pm

Not like it's the only military based prison.. At least 4 that I know of..

Reply
bethanyq Ess Eff
10/16/13 3:53 pm

"Terrorists"? Sorry, have they been tried and convicted?

Reply
penguins511
10/16/13 3:57 pm

You are technically correct, I won't lie, but they were captured in the battlefield I mean if I were simply a civilian in the area I would get the hell out of there which makes it highly unlikely they are actually civilians.

Reply
mikeey1962 on SOH where else
10/16/13 3:48 pm

Move them to a stateside prison..

Reply
penguins511
10/16/13 3:52 pm

If we moved them to the US they would gain some rights by being on our soil which could cause problems with the countries they came from.

Reply
mikeey1962 on SOH where else
10/16/13 3:53 pm

We could reopen Alcatraz,

Reply
zman117 Ohio
10/16/13 4:23 pm

How did you do it Bethany, how did you cheat on the bar exam in California?

Reply
bethanyq Ess Eff
10/16/13 9:19 pm

Gitmo isn't a POW camp and does not comply with the rules for detention of POWs. Further, there are no plans for eventual repatriation, a prerequisite for POW status. They aren't being held until a war ends. They are supposedly being held for crimes.

Reply
bethanyq Ess Eff
10/16/13 8:27 pm

The Geneva Conventions declare it one of the gravest of war crimes to engage in torture. Another grave war crime? Willfully depriving someone accused of another war crime of their right to a fair trial.

Reply
XposeBarak Out There
10/16/13 4:03 pm

No bethany we dont do that anymore

Reply
zman117 Ohio
10/16/13 4:07 pm

Holding an uncharged "combatant" indefinitely is absolutely unacceptable.

Reply
zman117 Ohio
10/16/13 4:17 pm

He hasn't delivered on quite a few things.

Reply
MisterE Conservistan
10/16/13 7:40 pm

At this time, no. It's going to be a long road to become safely detached from world events.

Reply
bethanyq Ess Eff
10/16/13 4:19 pm

"Highly unlikely" isn't the burden of proof in criminal cases, unless the law has seriously changed since I took the bar exam.

Reply
bethanyq Ess Eff
10/16/13 4:25 pm

I see what you did there...

Reply
GeneralDevin MN
10/16/13 9:56 pm

I do agree we should close some bases however. We think we're the world police.

Reply
GotHeem Indiana
10/17/13 3:13 pm

It provides a great place to hold terrorists so they cannot escape and immediately be on American soil. And since it's not on American soil we can get the information out of the terrorists much more effectively

Reply
mikeey1962 on SOH where else
10/16/13 3:40 pm

Yes and no.. But mostly yes.. Without Fidel, I don't think we need to worry bout Cuba anymore

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
10/16/13 6:52 pm

Yes, and every other US base around the world. I agree with Ron Paul!

Reply
cowboy Proud Father
10/17/13 9:46 am

Other Countries already do that.

Reply
political Georgia
10/16/13 4:09 pm

Mr. Obama is not following through on his promise, is he?

Reply
political Georgia
10/16/13 3:47 pm

Let them go free and terrorize us some more. Jk
I support Guantanamo Bay.

Reply
mikeey1962 on SOH where else
10/16/13 3:54 pm

I'm sure tourist, would pay big money to add them to the tour...

zman117 Ohio
10/16/13 4:25 pm

Lol sorry, I thought of that when I read bar exam. I just watched Catch Me if You Can again.

One point goes to whoever knows what state is in the actual quote...

GeneralDevin MN
10/16/13 9:55 pm

Closing every base would mean closing every embassy too. Powerful countries like us have embassies. We'd lose power and influence resulting in other countries looking down on us and see us as a shrinking power out of its prime.

Mattwall1
10/16/13 5:20 pm

The base as well, or just the prison?

jvc1133 61535
10/17/13 10:06 am

The comment seems obvious, answer it

badattitude no place like home
10/16/13 5:22 pm

Why do we need to close a strategic base? The prison is another story. It is useful. But necessary?

NateE Moderate Republican
10/16/13 3:43 pm

Hey do you follow A-Fly and participate that that congress. I think you would like that and you would be another smart guy in it

doctalk not all who wander r lost
10/16/13 4:36 pm

A family member disappeared in 1931 from his home in Russia during the "threats." Government accusation without defense is dangerous. The USA is "droning" enemy suspects whose only crime has been to be seen w a known enemy. Will we be as unsafe?

MisterE Conservistan
10/16/13 7:35 pm

To my knowledge, the Geneva conventions do not say anything about holding POWs without charging them.

NateE Moderate Republican
10/16/13 3:45 pm

This name is SpeakerAFly with no spaces

MisterE Conservistan
10/16/13 9:03 pm

If they are recognized as POWs, the US can hold them until the end of hostilities without charging them. I never said that I agreed with torturing POWs. There are better ways to extract information.

political Georgia
10/16/13 3:46 pm

Another issue we agree on, Nathan, or at least I think we do....

Mattwall1
10/16/13 3:47 pm

The base? Or just the prison?

Mattwall1
10/16/13 5:10 pm

@nathan: are you meaning closing the base, or only the prison?