Should we term limit supreme court justices?
Supreme Court Justices need to be concentrated on the law and how the law is interpreted they do not need to be concentrating on getting reelected or politics in general.
I prefer the absence of predictable turnover in the Supreme Court.
What if there’s no “re-election”? They get one, single 18-year term and then they’re done.
Just the conservatives 😊
That's a good question offhand I would say 18 years is not long enough but you do have a good point none the less.
20 year term
Those are all good points. My concern would be what they do when they are done serving a term, be at 18 or 25 years. I think that would need to be limited as well or there is a potential for it to influence decisions. It's a tough one.
Rob, so what? Laws outlive justices and their tenures all the time. They don’t need to sit on the court to keep laws in place.
This site (and justice Breyer) make compelling arguments...
no, that not what I meant, it's not the stability of the laws that are created that I'm concerned about, it's the stability of the judge.
Rob, I was actually thinking it could influence decisions throughout their whole term. Lecturing or teaching after serving would be fine but lobbying or running for office would not be. Those are the best examples I could come up with off the top of my head.
alright that makes sense to me.
Yang supports 16 yr term limits
That's exactly what I'm trying to say though it's those long-term positions that we need the 50 and 60 year positions.
For a judge to only be in a term for 18 years is relatively short we need judges to understand the law which is not an easy thing to do. Especially when it's your job to interpret it and make case law.
As it pertains to an individual human being 18 years is substantial.
But looking at the lifespan of a law, 18 years is miniscule.
🤔 again a great point I overlooked..
if I understand you correctly, your talking about influences towards the end of their term. Decisions made that could have some sort of conflict of interest as it pertains to their career after the fact.
is that round about what you were thinking ?
(no blame to you for not understanding what I ment. that falls on me and my lazy grammar)
@omniku, may I ask what YOUR main concern is with life time appointments?
Omniku is thinking more like I am, not making them elected but making it not a lifetime position so we don't get people sitting on the court for 40-50 years.