Show of HandsShow of Hands

Comments: Add Comment

EarlyBird Portland
12/24/16 8:35 pm

So a drunk driver is fine unless he hits someone?

TheSpookyGhost paleoconservative
12/24/16 6:41 pm

There's no such thing as a victimless crime.

Zach21 California
12/24/16 10:05 pm

So a drunk driver shouldn't be charged unless he hurts someone?

AKCowboysFan Anchorage m8
12/24/16 11:24 pm

Most crimes are victimless at first. Drunk driving doesn't have a victim until the driver slams into another car and kills everyone in it. Doing meth doesn't have a victim until the drug user is addicted and let's his kids starve so he can get another high. Unless you penalize these things before they get a victim, there will be a victim.

Twinkeys Minnesota
12/24/16 7:54 pm

True. One shouldn't be charged with a crime that only harmed them.

phalnx Ohio
12/24/16 11:22 pm

In my opinion, no. All he's done up to that point is drink alcohol and drive. It's like farting alone in the woods...if there's no one around to smell it, it didn't happen.