Show of HandsShow of Hands

Think December 16th, 2016 4:31pm

Is there evidence that the Russians had more of an impact than the Saudis in the election?

12 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

Okie1967 Lets go brandon
12/16/16 9:56 am

Apparently not, and being butt hurt isn't evidence.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:17 am

Polster ... wait ... Mrs Clinton's "word" is now proof!?

You've GOT to be kidding!

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:12 am

Polster ... show your proof of the Wild allegation.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:02 am

If you answered yes, please share your evidence.

Reply
badattitude no place like home
12/16/16 10:57 am

Even if Russia is guilty of hacking the DNC, what are they really guilty of? Giving the American people more information than they would have had? Without people hacking into the DNC email, we would never have known about Hillary's public and private policy's. We would never have known that Hillary spoke disparagingly about Catholics or pay to play or colluded with the media or any of it. The left is just mad that there was too much transparency in this last election. I'm sorry that the people saw right through your candidate. It was exposed by someone that seems to care more about this country and democracy than the democrats. That's sad if it's the Russians instead of real journalists.

Reply
MrWalrus Undergrid
12/16/16 10:13 am

So far it looks like 7 democrats have voted and they all said yes. Despite a democrat insider saying that they leaked everything because of the way the Democrats handled their primary.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:20 am

Polster ... your problem is that you -- as so many headless leftists -- have attempted to jump the shark. Unfortunate for your position, your fast talking doesn't validate your lies!

Conflating supposed Russian hacking with affecting the election fails on its face. You've shown. I connection that affected the outcome of the election.

Reply
RussianThunder Russia and USA
12/16/16 10:00 am

⬆⬆⬆this⬆⬆⬆

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:22 am

Polster ... psst ... the election wasn't held until November.

It appears that you're in the cusp of admitting that MrO knew about supposed Russian hacking before the election and chose to do nothing about it.

Again, you've failed in your attempt to conflate supposed Russian hacking with election outcome.

Reply
Okie1967 Lets go brandon
12/16/16 10:42 am

They conspired to steal the nomination from sanders and democrats act like the American people didn't deserve to Learn about it. I don't care if it came from a hack or leak. They really did a number on sanders and his supporters.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 11:02 am

Break ... exactly! If they're responsible (which Wikileaks denies), then they're only guilty of exposing the corruption of the left! Of course the left doesn't like that!

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:12 am

Did the Russians at least hack into the DNC? Yes. Did this make any difference in the outcome of the election? Impossible to say for sure.

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
12/16/16 10:41 am

This user is currently being ignored

Reply
think4yourself Not a safe space
12/16/16 1:05 pm

Misinformation? Those were emails those democrats actually wrote.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 9:35 pm

AKA ... didn't Mrs Clinton spend the Saudis ' hundreds of millions of dollars on propaganda? Ya, the Saudis bought influence and Mrs Clinton is their whore.

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:18 am

No, independent fact checkers have corroborated what she said in October. You didn't read the links, did you?

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:24 am

I haven't conflated the two. Obama did know about Russia's hacking before the election and did nothing.

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:27 am

How many times do I have to say that it is not known whether the Russian hacking had any impact on the election results?

Reply
think4yourself Not a safe space
12/16/16 12:46 pm

Breck. You hit the nail on the head. The liberals are just angry because they were exposed.

Reply
skinner Jersey City
12/16/16 12:55 pm

Yes, the Russians hacked the Democratic Party and deliberately spread misinformation. The Saudis had no clear impact on the election, other than generating controversy by donating to the Clinton Foundation, which has nothing to do with the actual mechanisms of the campaign.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:44 am

Polster ... many more times! How many times have you admitted that Saudi support of corrupt Mrs Clinton had a real impact in the election?

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 11:40 am

I'll trust the 17 US intelligence agencies that have implicated Russia in the hacking over some lousy tabloid article, thanks.

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 11:41 am

LITERALLY FROM YOUR OWN SOURCE:

"The overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the 2016 election, three American officials said on Monday.

While the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) does not dispute the CIA’s analysis of Russian hacking operations, it has not endorsed their assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence that Moscow intended to boost Trump over Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton, said the officials, who declined to be named."

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 11:44 am

Polster ... you're a gnat, shooo!

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 11:45 am

lj74...Nowhere did I say that Russia influenced or even tried to influence the election. All I said was that Russia did, in fact, hack into the DNC. That's all.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 10:51 am

Guy ... keep moving the goalposts, that's all the pathetic left has remaining. Over the past eight years you all have shown that Democrats can't govern, and so it's time to let the adults on the right clean up your mess.

I expect that the 100s of millions of dollars "invested" by the Saudis and other nefarious actors close to the corrupt Mrs Clinton swayed some feeble-minded voters.

There is absolutely no confirmed tie between the Russians and ANYTHING. It's all pathetic leftists who knowingly and dishonestly tried to influence the election.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 9:34 pm

Skin ... please share your sources of the lies.

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 12:07 pm

Polsters ... my claim is totally valid. Are you attempting to suggest that we don't already have the proof that the Saudis contributed tens of millions of dollars to Mrs Clinton's campaign of deceit?

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 12:09 pm

Polster ... do you trust those 17 agencies with their reports on WMDs in Iraq?

What's the FBI saying about Russian influence on the election?

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 12:13 pm

Think...If you're not going to believe the experts, then who are you going to believe?

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 12:13 pm

Polster ... answer the questions! Did the Saudis contribute to the corrupt Mrs Clinton's campaign? Do you have evidence that instead of propagandizing the country with her lies that Mrs Clinton used the Saudi money to give dying kids in Africa malaria shots?

Just stop the lies!

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 12:15 pm

Polster ... who'd expect you to be honest and answer the question?

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:21 am

I specifically said in my first comment, if you had bothered to read it, that it's unknown whether the Russian hacking handed Mr. Trump the victory. All we know is that the hacking occurred.

Reply
chickencookie Biden crime family
12/16/16 10:39 am

@RussianThunder here is another video I hope makes you smile. It's a spoof of Oprah Winfrey and how she used to give free gifts to the audience and the women went crazy.
www.hulu.com/watch/284579

Reply
badattitude no place like home
12/16/16 12:52 pm

You're right of course. I didn't answer the question very well. In fact I don't even know what impact the Saudi's had on the election. I missed that news article

Reply
lj74
12/16/16 12:52 pm

The Saudis are listed as Clinton Foundation donors.

Reply
RussianThunder Russia and USA
12/16/16 11:33 am

That was funny. I had to look up who she was. I have never seen her show.

Reply
IrishAlzheimers oakland, ca
12/16/16 10:22 pm

If the money had anything to do with the election and not just paying off her own personal assets which is also possible then it only influenced the primary election.
The sauds help put a moderate republican up as the democratic primary

Reply
Think Lovin Life
12/16/16 11:44 am

Guy ... are you saying that the Russians changed the outcome of the election? If so, prove it.

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:49 am

None since there's no direct evidence of that.

Reply
IrishAlzheimers oakland, ca
12/17/16 1:43 am

Bernie sanders would probably be president right now if the saudis didn't fund that moderate Republican.

Reply
thatguy2 We tried to warn you
12/16/16 10:55 am

This user is currently being ignored

Reply
ladyniner81 extremists are a cancer
12/20/16 12:04 am

Teapublicans don't give a flying fart about links, truth or opinions. They just want to see Hillary in jail.

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 12:16 pm

Think...The FBI has not commented on whether the DNC was hacked, but why don't believe the 17 US intelligence agencies that have said it was?

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 10:19 am

Here's the statement released on October 7th from the intelligence community proving that what she said was true:

www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/215-press-releases-2016/1423-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement

Reply
polster2 US
12/16/16 11:23 am

Think loves the "argument from ignorance" fallacy. It's commonly used by conspiracy theorists. Basically, they say "you can't prove that what I said isn't true!!!!" Meanwhile, the conspiracy theorists usually have no evidence that what they say is, in fact, true.

Reply