Show of HandsShow of Hands

Arkansas123 June 30th, 2013 4:46pm

Yesterday was the anniversary of Rosenberger v. UVA (1995). In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for a public university to fund secular student organizations while denying funds to religious student organizations.

15 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

Arkansas123 Neoconservative
06/30/13 9:51 am

I agree. All student organizations, religious or nonreligious, should be treated equally by the university. All students pay activities fees, and student groups should have access to those funds on equal terms.

commonsense America isnt racist
06/30/13 12:23 pm

@arkansas123, you have possibly the best poll question series out there. Please continue to educate us.

06/30/13 1:23 pm

I mean I wouldn't support not funding a religious organisation and not a secular one either. I don't support not funding one exclusively over the other.

CTYankee!!! Connecticut
06/30/13 3:54 pm

Fund all or none

Keldeo Laverre City
06/30/13 11:28 am

Yes, that would be favoring a religion (or lack of).

beanD California
06/30/13 2:18 pm

Ah, got it.

06/30/13 9:50 am

I wouldn't support it even if secular organisations weren't being funded and religious were.

EagleOK Oklahoma
06/30/13 12:08 pm

Wow. I can tell how tolerant you are. Geez..."religious ****nut".

BeachSt Coastal Virginia
06/30/13 9:58 am

I could agree with that. UVA is always in trouble, though. Just this term, Ken Cucinelli was suing them for something about religion (because he's a religious fuck-nut). That was a big debacle, costing the university hundreds of thousands of $...

BeachSt Coastal Virginia
06/30/13 9:58 am

...because he didn't agree with what they were doing. There were calls for the governor to set aside money in the budget for that. People were pissed.

BeachSt Coastal Virginia
06/30/13 12:21 pm

I am tolerant, but you don't live in Virginia. He's fucking nuts for a politician and has no place as governor.