People who claim they're pro choice because "it's her body" (dumb) then also say things like "your rights end where another's begin" are being inconsistent.
It's only inconsistent if you think the fetus has rights.
These are the same people that are against the death penalty for violent offenders. However, for the death penalty for the innocent. Don't make sense.
Thank you rond for explaining something you don't agree with in a rational and intelligent way.
You're right, EB. That is a problem. Pro-abortion groups have spent a lot of money convincing people both to ignore science, and to somehow believe that "choice" is more important than life.
I agree. The child is certainly effected by an abortion.
Like slaves right?
A decision they make to make their stance easier. They play semantics rather than face the issue.
Maybe reproductive biology isn't a strong area for you.
Oh, I'm sorry for the confusion.
I took it for granted that people would understand I was referring to human life.
I should have been more clear.
There's always that one person in the crowd who needs me to speak a little slower.
Save the guilty, kill the innocent.
The problem is that the pro-choice crowd doesn't see the baby as a life yet. That's the sticking point.
Nothing intelligent about that viewpoint. To dismiss life based on semantics is a disgusting tactic used by many in history.
I thought you had a better handle on science than that, statek.
Creatures, huh? I thought liberals were the "party of science"? Yikes!
Yw Texan. Rebelfury, what's the issue as you see it. I see the baby as a baby from conception. Therefore, abortion is murder. You likely don't see the baby as a baby until later and it's ok to kill it until that point because it's the mother's
I'll try to remember not to assume you can draw any logical conclusions on your own, Statek.
I am waiting for you to post that Monty Python song. Or maybe you are holding back because you don't want to pee your pants laughing.
Gotta speak slow, clear, and concise to libs. I've just had to explain to palindrome that being gay is not the same as acting on it.
I have to agree with the true statement.
Don't engage in reproduction then
You're wrong about me, we are in complete agreement
A woman shouldn't have to be held hostage by a fetus if she doesn't want to.
It's crazy. I've had them claim unborn babies are just like fingernails, hair follicles, and parasitic infections.
It's like they've never taken a reproductive bio class.
It makes me wonder what they think is about to happen every time a woman goes into labor. I bet they're honestly surprised when a bunch of fingernails don't fall out of the womb, or a little baby goat doesn't jump out and run across the room.
I'm sorry that you misspoke and had to change your argument
Decision to do what she wants with her body and it's not effecting anyone else because it's not a baby yet. Am I wrong?
Note the lack of judgment in my original and follow up comment.
Rebel, I may have misread your comment. If so, please correct me.
The problem is that libs don't see the unborn as people.
Do you want another crime wave to happen? Because that's how you get another crime wave to happen
Yeah, sperm are living creatures made by humans too
You said "Life"
Sperm is "Life"