Think Lovin Life
Dec 20, 6:26 pm
Z … please identify the latest person electrocuted or hanged for not strictly following the precepts of Christianity.
I’ll wait!
bringstheeagle Colorado
Dec 20, 12:53 pm
I think the harder truth is that many Americans already accept religious influence in governance—so long as it’s their religion.
We routinely see political arguments grounded explicitly in Christian theology: on abortion, LGBTQ rights, marriage, education, and public morality. It’s also common to hear claims that the Founders were Christians who never intended a strict separation of church and state. That’s not a fringe position; it’s mainstream in some circles.
Seen that way, the objection to Islamic governance isn’t really about religion mixing with politics—it’s about which religion does the mixing.
That doesn’t mean all theocratic systems are compatible with liberal democracy. Many aren’t. But it does suggest that cultural incompatibility is often overstated, while selective comfort with religious authority is understated.
In practice, the debate isn’t “theocracy vs. secularism.”
It’s which religious values people are willing to see encoded into law—and which ones they aren’t.
Odysseus We All Need A Fantasy
Dec 20, 10:12 am
I am not here to defend Islam in any way but we need to attempt to be fair.
We usually think of Muslim Middle East theocracies but the largest Muslim nation by far is Indonesia.
Indonesia is not a theocracy; it's officially a secular, democratic republic with a state philosophy called Pancasila that requires belief in one God but doesn't establish an Islamic state, blending religious values with a diverse, pluralistic foundation, though it officially recognizes six religions and sometimes faces issues with applying blasphemy laws. It's considered a "middle ground," recognizing religion's public role while avoiding the extremes of a pure secular state or an Islamic theocracy.
Think Lovin Life
Dec 20, 4:01 pm
Goo … it’s always a hoot to see your hysteria. Remember, you leftists all demanded that we join the Church of Climate Alarm and demanded that we pay trillions to your silly idols!
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Dec 20, 2:53 pm
I don’t see them as comparable at all. One tries to create a Sharia state anywhere it settles, provided it gains enough dominance. Islam, when practiced according to the text, does not allow for democracy. To my knowledge, every other major religion does.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Dec 20, 11:06 pm
Yes actually, there is a very distinct separation of church and state within the Bible—Jesus’ Caesar verse. However, that’s irrelevant because this poll has nothing to do with Christianity. It’s about Islam, which is far more political in nature and not at all comparable to Christianity in the way westerners think.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Dec 20, 2:43 pm
The “familiar” traditions do not call for ongoing war and hatred. Islamic text does. The continued attacks across the world, all attributed to the same ideology, aren’t coincidence. They’re driven by the text. The ideology is the source.
People need to educate themselves on this ideology. It is unlike any other. Even calling it a religion is a stretch once you truly understand it. It’s more political than religious, certainly in percentage of text dedicated to each topic.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Dec 20, 11:43 am
This is true. Sort of. Indonesia is secular on paper. Not so much in practice—though one might not realize that if they’d only visited the tourist areas.
Regardless, Pancasila is not an Islamic concept. It was formed by Indonesian nationalists, because they needed a way to unify everyone to fight off the Dutch. At the time, there were hardline Islamists who wanted a Sharia state, including getting thier special unbeliever tax and all that, but they had no choice but to yield. So there were extenuating circumstances. They also have islands, which maintain a good deal of cultural separation that I think makes coexistence easier.
Even despite all that, though, there was still an Islamic uprising (where they tried forcing Sharia again) and several other flare ups after Pancasila was established.
That said, Indonesia does show mostly peaceful coexistence is possible (jihadists attacks, etc. still occur).
PamGH SW Washington
Dec 20, 10:46 am
Thank you for that view. I will try to absorb it. I work very hard at not being ‘tribal’, but I will admit, Islam is one of my last and biggest hurdle.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Today: 9:34 am
The poll is about a the ideology of Islam. You want to make it into a critisism of the west—which you seem to hate. More power to ya. I just feel you might prefer living somewhere else, considering your feelings about the west.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Dec 20, 11:47 pm
Outlaw, this poll is not about Muslims. It’s about the ideology of Islam.
That said, you make a good point, and I think you inadvertently highlighted the crux of the matter. If you claim you’re a Muslim, shouldn’t I assume you adhere to the ideology? If yes, then I have to assume that, to you, I’m your enemy—because Islam clearly lays out the battle lines between Muslims and everyone else.
So what do we do with that? I’m not the type to blanket prejudice an entire group, and I know there are tons of Muslims who want to escape this ideology. But how do we deal with an ideology that promotes hate and conquering the way this one does?
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Today: 1:19 am
True. They’re not official theocracies in that they’re not run by clerics. But Islam is the dominant influence in everything from Sharia courts to gender segregation to dress requirements to alcohol bans, etc.
IrishAlzheimer
Today: 7:22 am
“In Islam, there is no separation of mosque and state.”
That’s not how Islam actually operates in real life. It’s a theoretical claim based on selective religious texts, not a description of how Muslim societies function.
“Sharia governs everything.”
This is simply false as a descriptive claim. Sharia is not a single legal code, not uniformly interpreted, and not uniformly applied. Across Muslim-majority societies, you find:
• Secular civil law systems
• Hybrid legal systems
• Customary law overriding religious law
• Sharia limited to family or inheritance law
• Sharia ignored altogether in daily governance
To say “Sharia governs everything” is like saying “Christianity governs everything in Europe” because canon law exists. It confuses normative ideals with historical reality.
Krystina Let Freedom Reign
Today: 9:24 am
We’re living in 2025, not in the past. Doesn’t matter, though. Your views are so anti-west that it’s not worth discussing. Maybe consider moving someplace you’d don’t hate? Just a thought.
Comments: Add Comment