Show of HandsShow of Hands

iloveyou3002 November 8th, 2025 7:32pm

Supreme Court lets SNAP benefits run out. Do you support or oppose this?

14 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

mstt
Today: 1:14 pm

Ask Chuck Schumer, he’s doing just that.

Reply
bnnt Los Angeles
Today: 1:58 pm

SCOTUS doesn’t have the ability to approve funding. That would make a horrible precedent. Congress approves budgets- that shouldnt change.

This entire shutdown is the democrats fault.

Reply
cowboy Evil will not prevail
Today: 3:02 pm

Let Schumer and the Democrats own it.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
Today: 3:35 pm

The Supreme Court didn’t let SNAP run out. Congress did.

Reply
Crawdaddy11 big TESLA fan
Today: 1:33 pm

Trump could do something about it but he is golfing.

Reply
RWtalk22
Today: 3:39 pm

The courts do not make the budget or allocate money!

Reply
TrumpWon2024
Today: 1:33 pm

the dems voted to keep it shutdown like 15+ times, but you know that, dumby

Reply
TJ319 been here forever
Today: 2:33 pm

Financial aid isn't essential.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 3:35 pm

We keep posting that the majority of those on snap WORK. Majority full time. Quit ignoring the facts...

Reply
TiredofIt Texas
Today: 4:07 pm

Support in that it is not up to the judicial branch to direct where money goes.

Idk how anyone can think this shutdown isn’t Democrat caused with all the blocking of the full bill and individual bills to pay for SNAP benefits or pay the military or pay federal workers or air traffic controllers. They are holding all of that spending hostage as leverage. It’s not even a debate who is stopping funding.

Reply
Eagle01 USA
Today: 1:38 pm

What is wrong with you people? I pray you never have to have member’s of your family go hungry…

Reply
TJ319 been here forever
Today: 2:32 pm

If there is a shutdown, federal money should only go to the essential things. Snap is extra not essential. They need to go to work and agree on a legit budget

Reply
moldypipes99 TEAM TRUMP
Today: 3:21 pm

If you work as essential federal worker , you are working but not getting paid , so how do you feed yourself.

BUT

If you stay home and are on the government dole, you should not get money for food currently.

Why should a person who doesn’t work get money for food , while the fed gov worker whom is actively working NOT get money for food.

Make that make sense.

Reply
TJ319 been here forever
Today: 3:27 pm

That is not the primary responsibility of the government. If they have extra it is great to do, but not an essential function.

Reply
iloveyou3002 P Sherman
Today: 12:33 pm

Why anyone would let 40 million United States citizens starve I don’t know. 😒😒😒

Reply
DTinCA Stand Up To Fascism
Today: 1:10 pm

Remember when the Supreme Court did the right thing?

Reply
TrumpWon2024
Today: 1:30 pm

thank the democrats for this lesson in what its like to live in the real world.

Reply
Crawdaddy11 big TESLA fan
Today: 1:32 pm

Trump is in charge not the democrats.

Reply
LibertyWatch000 Ohio
Today: 3:50 pm

That’s not the function of the government though. That’s the responsibility of the Church.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 4:22 pm

Oh okay so because the Trump Administration can't fund it legally. Gotcha.

Reply
MountainWoman82 Spread Trans Joy
Today: 4:42 pm

Republicans are for starving children.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 2:32 pm

So food isn't essential. Got it...

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 2:50 pm

Correct for providing food is not essential government function.

Reply
MountainWoman82 Spread Trans Joy
Today: 4:43 pm

Pro forced birth. Not pro life.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 3:10 pm

Providing food to those in need is EVERYONE'S responsibility, including the government. But, I'm sure you would just let them starve...

Reply
tstone91
Today: 3:21 pm

5 Dems can vote yes and feed everybody.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 3:36 pm

Food is essential. Every moral human knows that...

Reply
LibertyWatch000 Ohio
Today: 3:53 pm

The democrats could do something about it but they put illegals above American citizens. Thats what this has always been about. You leftists are liars. You don’t care about those on Snap. This is a political ploy so you can blame Trump because you hate him and wish he were dead. No, Americans first, illegals should all be deported. The government needs to reopen so those on SNAP can eat.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 4:14 pm

It is the responsibility of EVERYONE who's capable. Including the government. Anyone who says otherwise aren't really concerned with children not being able to have food.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 4:19 pm

& currently the government is incapable of providing food.

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
Today: 4:33 pm

The president of the federal government intent cannot unilaterally create and budget and fund things without congressional approval. This has always been the case.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 5:13 pm

Yes a judge has ordered the Trump Administration to use other funds and when Trump okay how the judge had no response.

And the Supreme Court has paused The Impossible judgment.

Reply
TJ319 been here forever
Today: 5:32 pm

Food is essential for people, its not an essential role of the government

Reply
RightOfCenter TheCurrentThing
Today: 5:57 pm

If people are being lifted out of poverty why are there now 42 million on food stamps, reportedly 40% more during Biden Admin….

Reply
cato Santa Barbara, California
Today: 1:05 pm

I still don’t understand why the most liberal of all the judges Ketanji Brown Jackson halted the order requiring full SNAP payments. Head scratching for sure.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 2:34 pm

So now it's important that congress control the money spent. How convenient...

Reply
Liberty 4,032,064
Today: 3:35 pm

A better question is why (or rather if) 40 million people are dependent are actually dependent on government for food.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 4:29 pm

The government can use other money to pay for SNAP, and a federal court has ordered it to do so during a government shutdown, despite the administration's initial refusal. While contingency funds were used to make partial payments, judges determined that the government had the discretion to tap other funds to ensure full benefits were provided to recipients.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 5:13 pm

There are no funds available that can be legally tapped into.

Reply
makem Chinese Xinjiang Camp
Today: 5:34 pm

I'd like to point out that this decision was made by the SCoTUS Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Reply
RightOfCenter TheCurrentThing
Today: 5:52 pm

SCOTUS did not let SNAP benefits run out.
KBJ the Justices who oversees the First District sent the ruling that violates separation of powers back to the First District Court of Appeals.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 6:05 pm

SNAP isn't an anti-poverty program.

It's a pro-poverty program.
You remove the personal responsibility of feeding yourself and your family and you remove one of the primary reasons for life.

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 6:07 pm

Wait DJ are you unaware that after the Court ruled that Trump must fund snap that Trump said 'okay how?'

Reply
TrumpWon2024
Today: 3:20 pm

props for the “upin’er” πŸ‘†πŸΌπŸ‘ŒπŸΌ

Reply
DJ13
Today: 5:16 pm

"When Trump okay how the judge had no response"... WHAT..

Also, what does an "impossible judgment" mean..

Reply
DJ13
Today: 5:36 pm

SNAP is an essential government program because it is one of the most effective anti-poverty tools, lifting millions of people out of poverty each year.

Reply
DJ13
Today: 6:07 pm

Nice opinion Bob. But wrong...

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 6:08 pm

More people are on SNAP benefits than died of covid in the entirety of covid in the United States. (Not just the hight of the pandemic, but Total)

Reply
LibertarianB0b Christian Libertarian
Today: 6:18 pm

SNAP doesnt lift the majority of its benefactors out of poverty. There are a minority of people that use it temporary to lift themselves out of poverty. The a large swath of people use the subsidy as a crutch to keep hobbling through life.

People are dependent on SNAP benefits for their lifestyle and we are seeing their pleads for SNAP payments to continue surfacing all across the internet.

Some women are even bold enough to complain that they no longer have money for themselves and must spend it on their children to put food on the table.

A person who uses SNAP benefits for their livelihood is a person in poverty. A person who uses SNAP benefits to make it through the month is a person living in poverty.
A person who uses SNAP benefits for the time between losing income and finding income, is lifting themselves out of poverty.

Reply
liberalcultist
Today: 6:48 pm

Then democrats should vote to open the government

Reply