Show of Hands

There was no such thing as “Don’t Say Gay”

Liars and hypocrites.

lol. Corporations are all hypocrites. Disney would host a Klan rally if it was profitable.

Disney today is a WOKE cesspool of degenerates !

The left always renames bills they don’t like.

Just like they do with language:
Legal term - illegal alien
Media - immigrant (no regard to legal or illegal)

Orwellian by practice.

the problem with this is youre trying to treat leftists like they have any principles. their opinion shifts to whatever is politically expedient for them.

Greedy degenerates

This article is rage bait. And it’s working!

What has that got to do with Disney now building a park where it's illegal to be gay?

I strongly believe this to be true. For many people money determines their morality.

I'm utterly shocked that a company would choose to only have morals when it's profitable

100%!! That article is designed to get people fired up vs objective journalism.

You’re combining unrelated topics with sarcastic fabrications as if that proves something. The Them.us article is a breakdown of the DeSantis vs. Disney situation in Florida—about state retaliation for political speech. That’s the issue I was addressing.

The Variety article you linked says nothing about Disney saying “we hate gays,” nor does it quote “Sheik Abanona” making death threats. That’s not in the article because it didn’t happen—you’re just making stuff up to stir outrage.

If you’re serious about journalism vs. commentary, start by not spreading fake quotes. Then we can talk.

I think this is a better less bias understanding of the matter.

www.them.us/story/desantis-vs-disney-drama-explained

I would say more that the left has a larger variety of individuals that fight with each other about any one topic. Creating a more diverse culture of something. The right is more unified in their hate and vitriol for things they refuse to try and understand.

Except. They were. The quote I referenced was right in the article. What I messed up was who said it. I apologized and you can’t let up. Now you’re just gaslighting and trying to bullying me.

Don’t you have a job or something?

All the more reason they need to stop preaching their politics.

The next move should be to build one in Palestine. They could make it illegal to be gay and Jewish. They could book trips from American universities.

Good idea?

A corporation goes the way that leads to more money 😱

Here is a source quoting Sheik Abanona as saying "they hate gays and will kill them on site.
And it quotes Disney as saying -" we are doing it for the cash but we hate gays"

variety.com/2025/tv/news/disney-earnings-fiscal-q2-2025-streaming-profit-iger-outlook-1236388735/

Why not just say the left is morally and intellectually superior.

Isn't that "settled science"

Oh nacho1. The The supreme leader of SOH and all that is holy great. I supremely apologize from the bottom of my worthless shoes. I am not worthy of your greats and utter likeness. Please do not look up upon me as I am worthless to your greatness.

How’s that? Is does that rub your ego into ecstasy?

Yes yes, because say it with me now:

Disney is a business who cares more about money than principles.

It’s business. Money talks as they say.

Yet it may be true for most corporations. The larger they are, the more dissolved their collective morality.

In the little research I did, it is apparent, that area is in somewhat of a cultural change. Who knows where this goes. I admit, on the surface it does not appear to be a Disney destination.

Both.

Did you read the source and see the byline - "News and Commentary"

Do you understand the difference between "objective journalism" and "commentary"?

Is this meant to be "commentary"

“Why not just say the left is morally and intellectually superior.”

You said it not me. “Settled Science” needs to be put into context. Is it “all but settled science” referring to us putting more research on how to fix a problem instead of debating if the same results that keep coming up are actually true? Then yes it’s all but settled science.

Canyou point out the paragraph and the sentence location for the quote you attributed to the fraud Mann in either of the sources you posted.

Where is it in the AP report
Where is it in the Yale story

StillSlick87

"The quote I referenced was right in the article"

Is that a true statement / please show me the line # and paragraph #
--------
To a lefty - asking a lefty to take ownership of a lie is bullying.

Comrade Trump
Regardless of why, he’s acting exactly like a Russian asset would.

foreignpolicy.com/2025/03/10/trump-putin-russia-asset-spy-security-ukraine-europe-war/

Objective Journalism or Commentary?

Let's see if you two can see the difference.

Yes I am "nachoing"

Asking a lefty to own up to a lie they were caught making.

How awful - we should just let everyone lie and not own it.
They would make SOH better right.

Naomi Oreskes: Well, I wouldn’t really say I was inspired to do it. I would say it was more like I tripped over something that I realized was important.

When I first started doing this work nearly 25 years ago, my goal was to investigate the relationship between scientific knowledge and funding. I was specifically looking at the impact of U.S. military funding on oceanography because oceanography went from being an extremely underfunded science in the early 20th century to being a very abundantly funded science when the U.S. Navy realized that better oceanographic information could help them do their job better.

In the process of doing that research, I stumbled across the story of a group of oceanographers talking about the threat of human-made climate change from burning fossil fuels. I learned that these scientists had a pretty good grasp of this problem. Even in 1958, they already understood that when we burn fossil fuels, we put greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and those gases heat the atmosphere, and it was extremely likely that in the fullness of time, burning fossil fuels would lead to global climate change.


Oreskes: If we’re asking people to support policy action, or asking people to make changes in their own lives, then I think they have a right to demand that the basis for that should be very solid in exchange. We shouldn’t be asking people to make big changes or spend money on solar panels or whatever it is if we aren’t sure what’s going on is well understood.

So I think it’s very important for the American people to understand that this really is settled science. We know that the Earth is warming because of human activities as well as we know that there’s gravity, as well as we know that DNA carries hereditary information. This is very well-established science.

Comrade Trump
Regardless of why, he’s acting exactly like a Russian asset would.

foreignpolicy.com/2025/03/10/trump-putin-russia-asset-spy-security-ukraine-europe-war/

Objective Journalism or Commentary?

Let's see if you two can see the difference.

Comrade Trump
Regardless of why, he’s acting exactly like a Russian asset would.

foreignpolicy.com/2025/03/10/trump-putin-russia-asset-spy-security-ukraine-europe-war/

Objective Journalism or Commentary?

Let's see if you two can see the difference.

[Another reason concerns] the legal context as we fight for policy actions. We’re seeing the EPA endangerment finding is now being endangered, and as we have to fight for action on this issue, one of the questions that comes up is, “What is the legal basis for action about climate change?” And my group has done some work on the history of the Clean Air Act. There have been debates both in Congress and in the courts about whether or not the Clean Air Act applies to carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases.

@StillSlick87

"This statement was made by Dr. Hayhoe, a respected climate scientist, emphasizing the strong consensus on human-induced climate change
Here’s the source for your reference:
apnews.com/article/climate-change-trump-firing-report-damage-a76d2e2d3dfec7318b124b05a78d1ee1"

Is that a true statement

Who uses that term other than a discredited scientist and political actors?

You never answered before...

Was it "settled science" for years Pluto was a planet?

Was Newtons observations "settled science" for centuries before Einstein?

Sorry q wrong thread - see below.

See that's an apology - you can tell because it's starts with "sorry" not "I will give you"

Now tell me again I never apologize when I am wrong.

variety.com/2025/tv/news/disney-earnings-fiscal-q2-2025-streaming-profit-iger-outlook-1236388735/

Did you see the quotes in the source?

It was a mistake. There was an apology. Your inability to realize that is your narcissistic personality coming between reality and your character.

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union, a global group of astronomy experts, established a definition of a planet that required it to "clear" its orbit, or in other words, be the largest gravitational force in its orbit.

Since Neptune's gravity influences its neighboring planet Pluto, and Pluto shares its orbit with frozen gases and objects in the Kuiper belt, that meant Pluto was out of planet status

phys.org/news/2018-09-pluto-reclassified-planet.amp

SETTLED SCIENCE for decades until it's not

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

You wrote the quote from article right there. That was in the article…

I already said I misquoted Hayhoe. You continue to beat a dead horse. What exactly are you trying to accomplish here?
The original statement was that settled science is used in a way when things have an outstanding amount of proof for them. That is exactly what that is saying. .