Show of HandsShow of Hands

EagleAtticus November 16th, 2014 2:46am

Do you believe it was fair to let Franklin Roosevelt exceed 2 terms as president?

7 Liked

Comments: Add Comment

Rotavele Alabama
11/16/14 3:15 am

A socialist that the current Texas Historybooks has completely began to target. It's sad that the next generation will believe this great president to be something he isn't.

BlackhawksFTW Here come the Hawks.
11/16/14 1:26 am

In the end, it was a good idea. On a similar note, a good portion of WWII occurred during FDR's third term. Here's some food for thought. What if someone else was president instead?

Joshua77 Jesus is Lord
11/15/14 10:23 pm

It was terribly unwise to give him even one term.

Pragmaniac Hipsterville
11/15/14 11:09 pm

He was one of our greatest presidents.

Joshua77 Jesus is Lord
11/16/14 5:50 am

And I'd say he is in a three way tie for worst president along with Wilson and LBJ.

GrandmaALiCE For a better 2021
11/15/14 9:18 pm

Nobody "allowed it." He won the elections. Legally, nobody could have taken action to not "allow it."

Term limits were passed, as a backlash reaction to FDR's 4 terms.

Zod Above Pugetropolis
11/15/14 8:52 pm

Of course. Perfectly legit. It's better now though, that we don't allow it.

suppressedID That is my secret Cap
11/15/14 9:32 pm

Nobody could win 4 terms now.

Zod Above Pugetropolis
11/15/14 9:47 pm

Probably not, still, having lived through the debacle in the eighties, better safe than sorry.

brenstal Florida
11/15/14 8:41 pm

There wasn't a law against it. Any president up to that point could have taken that third term. He wasn't doing anything wrong.

cpaswr just say the letters
11/15/14 8:40 pm

No term limits then