Yesterday was the anniversary of Planned Parenthood v. Danforth (1976). The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a married woman has a fundamental right to abortion and that her husband has no authority to veto her choice under any circumstances.
I don't support abortion at all. But if it's going to happen, why don't both parents get equal representation? It shows the flaw of the "my body" argument. Daddy put his genes in the baby too.
reasons & case of rape but I'd prefer for rape that the morning after pill be used) I firmly believe that if it is allowed to be a choice, it is the woman's choice & her choice alone.
Ummm ......because even though there's an equal share of the genes only one person's body is doing the work of growing the baby. While I don't fully support abortion (I think it should be available for medical ......
I disagree. Assuming that a "right to abortion" exists, I think it is reasonable to attach to marriage the responsibility to obtain consent from the husband before an abortion procedure, excluding cases of spousal rape or maternal health.
In this case, Planned Parenthood v. Danforth (1976), the Supreme Court invalidated spousal consent laws. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the Supreme Court struck down spousal notification laws.
First, rape is the reason behind one percent of abortions. Second, it would not place an undue burden on the married woman to require her to sign a statement at the same time she is signing the informed consent form.
Get the district attorney, a judge, or a physician (not the abortionist) to certify in good faith that it is probable that the woman has suffered abuse; or require the woman to sign a statement saying that rape has occurred under penalty of perjury.
I consider it none of my business. That woman's story and her reasons for wanting an abortion are nobody's business but her own. I can't imagine the kind of mental pain behind which would have a married woman feeling like she needs a secret abortion.
Comments: Add Comment